From theinric at redhat.com Wed Nov 14 17:59:13 2007 From: theinric at redhat.com (theinric at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2007 17:59:13 +0100 Subject: [rsyslog] gss-api support for rsyslog Message-ID: <473B2961.9010705@redhat.com> Hi, here is a patch that enables rsyslog to use gss-api for authentication and encryption. It adds a new commandline option '-g' to listen for a connection wrapped with gss-api and few new configuration directives: for server: $gsslistenservicename for client: $gssforwardservicename $gssmode With gssmode set to "encryption" or "integrity" all tcp selectors will be forwarding messages via gss-api. http://people.redhat.com/pvrabec/rpms/rsyslog/rsyslog-1.19.10-gssapi.patch Comments are welcome. From mbiebl at gmail.com Wed Nov 14 18:50:17 2007 From: mbiebl at gmail.com (Michael Biebl) Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2007 18:50:17 +0100 Subject: [rsyslog] gss-api support for rsyslog In-Reply-To: <473B2961.9010705@redhat.com> References: <473B2961.9010705@redhat.com> Message-ID: 2007/11/14, theinric at redhat.com : > Hi, > > here is a patch that enables rsyslog to use gss-api for authentication > and encryption. > It adds a new commandline option '-g' to listen for a connection > wrapped with gss-api and few new configuration directives: > for server: > $gsslistenservicename > for client: > $gssforwardservicename > $gssmode > > With gssmode set to "encryption" or "integrity" all tcp selectors will > be forwarding messages via gss-api. Nice work! The only thing missing imho is documentation: rsyslogd --help does not list the paramenter, man rsyslogd also. man rsyslog.conf should document the new configuration directives and a html file in doc/ would be nice too. Cheers, Michael -- Why is it that all of the instruments seeking intelligent life in the universe are pointed away from Earth? From theinric at redhat.com Thu Nov 15 11:01:25 2007 From: theinric at redhat.com (theinric at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2007 11:01:25 +0100 Subject: [rsyslog] gss-api support for rsyslog In-Reply-To: References: <473B2961.9010705@redhat.com> Message-ID: <473C18F5.4000806@redhat.com> On 11/14/2007 06:50 PM, Michael Biebl wrote: > 2007/11/14, theinric at redhat.com : >> Hi, >> >> here is a patch that enables rsyslog to use gss-api for authentication >> and encryption. >> It adds a new commandline option '-g' to listen for a connection >> wrapped with gss-api and few new configuration directives: >> for server: >> $gsslistenservicename >> for client: >> $gssforwardservicename >> $gssmode >> >> With gssmode set to "encryption" or "integrity" all tcp selectors will >> be forwarding messages via gss-api. > > Nice work! The only thing missing imho is documentation: > rsyslogd --help does not list the paramenter, man rsyslogd also. > man rsyslog.conf should document the new configuration directives and > a html file in doc/ would be nice too. You're right, documentation hasn't been added yet. I want to wait for more feedback and maybe someone will come up with better directives names. :) From rgerhards at hq.adiscon.com Thu Nov 15 11:02:58 2007 From: rgerhards at hq.adiscon.com (Rainer Gerhards) Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2007 11:02:58 +0100 Subject: [rsyslog] gss-api support for rsyslog In-Reply-To: <473C18F5.4000806@redhat.com> References: <473B2961.9010705@redhat.com> <473C18F5.4000806@redhat.com> Message-ID: <577465F99B41C842AAFBE9ED71E70ABA308424@grfint2.intern.adiscon.com> In any case, it's a real nice piece of work. I have just returned from the US (this Monday) and there is still a pile of work I need to look at. I think next Monday I'll go back to rsyslog and integrating that patch is probably the #1 thing to do ;) Thanks, Rainer > -----Original Message----- > From: rsyslog-bounces at lists.adiscon.com [mailto:rsyslog- > bounces at lists.adiscon.com] On Behalf Of theinric at redhat.com > Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2007 11:01 AM > To: rsyslog-users > Subject: Re: [rsyslog] gss-api support for rsyslog > > On 11/14/2007 06:50 PM, Michael Biebl wrote: > > 2007/11/14, theinric at redhat.com : > >> Hi, > >> > >> here is a patch that enables rsyslog to use gss-api for > authentication > >> and encryption. > >> It adds a new commandline option '-g' to listen for a > connection > >> wrapped with gss-api and few new configuration directives: > >> for server: > >> $gsslistenservicename > >> for client: > >> $gssforwardservicename > >> $gssmode > >> > >> With gssmode set to "encryption" or "integrity" all tcp selectors > will > >> be forwarding messages via gss-api. > > > > Nice work! The only thing missing imho is documentation: > > rsyslogd --help does not list the paramenter, man rsyslogd also. > > man rsyslog.conf should document the new configuration directives and > > a html file in doc/ would be nice too. > > You're right, documentation hasn't been added yet. I want to wait for > more feedback and maybe someone will come up with better directives > names. :) > _______________________________________________ > rsyslog mailing list > http://lists.adiscon.net/mailman/listinfo/rsyslog From pvrabec at redhat.com Thu Nov 15 11:12:34 2007 From: pvrabec at redhat.com (Peter Vrabec) Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2007 11:12:34 +0100 Subject: [rsyslog] gss-api support for rsyslog In-Reply-To: <577465F99B41C842AAFBE9ED71E70ABA308424@grfint2.intern.adiscon.com> References: <473B2961.9010705@redhat.com> <473C18F5.4000806@redhat.com> <577465F99B41C842AAFBE9ED71E70ABA308424@grfint2.intern.adiscon.com> Message-ID: <200711151112.34201.pvrabec@redhat.com> thnx. Rainer, this is very important functionality for us. If you need any help or you have some questions drop us email. btw. F8 is out for a week and there are no bug reports on rsyslog, I hope it will continue this way ;-) peace :-) On Thursday 15 November 2007 11:02:58 am Rainer Gerhards wrote: > In any case, it's a real nice piece of work. I have just returned from > the US (this Monday) and there is still a pile of work I need to look > at. I think next Monday I'll go back to rsyslog and integrating that > patch is probably the #1 thing to do ;) From rgerhards at hq.adiscon.com Mon Nov 19 11:08:35 2007 From: rgerhards at hq.adiscon.com (Rainer Gerhards) Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2007 11:08:35 +0100 Subject: [rsyslog] gss-api support for rsyslog In-Reply-To: <200711151112.34201.pvrabec@redhat.com> References: <473B2961.9010705@redhat.com> <473C18F5.4000806@redhat.com> <577465F99B41C842AAFBE9ED71E70ABA308424@grfint2.intern.adiscon.com> <200711151112.34201.pvrabec@redhat.com> Message-ID: <1195466915.16341.14.camel@localhost.localdomain> Hi all, I have just done a rough review of the patch. From the code point of view it looks very well. So I have committed it to CVS, its now available. However, I am not yet 100% sure on how it is used. Maybe you can give me a jump start with a few notes on how to set it up and what to expect. That would enable me to better follow the code. And, yes, I know its all there in the code... ;) Thanks again for your great help. This indeed looks like a very important addition to rsyslog. Rainer On Thu, 2007-11-15 at 11:12 +0100, Peter Vrabec wrote: > thnx. Rainer, > > this is very important functionality for us. If you need any help or you have > some questions drop us email. > > btw. F8 is out for a week and there are no bug reports on rsyslog, I hope it > will continue this way ;-) > > peace :-) > > On Thursday 15 November 2007 11:02:58 am Rainer Gerhards wrote: > > In any case, it's a real nice piece of work. I have just returned from > > the US (this Monday) and there is still a pile of work I need to look > > at. I think next Monday I'll go back to rsyslog and integrating that > > patch is probably the #1 thing to do ;) > _______________________________________________ > rsyslog mailing list > http://lists.adiscon.net/mailman/listinfo/rsyslog From rgerhards at hq.adiscon.com Mon Nov 19 15:29:29 2007 From: rgerhards at hq.adiscon.com (Rainer Gerhards) Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2007 15:29:29 +0100 Subject: [rsyslog] gss-api support for rsyslog In-Reply-To: <1195466915.16341.14.camel@localhost.localdomain> References: <473B2961.9010705@redhat.com> <473C18F5.4000806@redhat.com><577465F99B41C842AAFBE9ED71E70ABA308424@grfint2.intern.adiscon.com><200711151112.34201.pvrabec@redhat.com> <1195466915.16341.14.camel@localhost.localdomain> Message-ID: <577465F99B41C842AAFBE9ED71E70ABA308482@grfint2.intern.adiscon.com> I have uploaded an interim version of the applied-patch-to-version to http://download.rsyslog.com/rsyslog/rsyslog-1.19.11.tar.gz in case that somebody would like to have an early look at the package. It still lacks any doc. Feedback is appreciated. Rainer > -----Original Message----- > From: rsyslog-bounces at lists.adiscon.com [mailto:rsyslog- > bounces at lists.adiscon.com] On Behalf Of Rainer Gerhards > Sent: Monday, November 19, 2007 11:09 AM > To: rsyslog-users > Subject: Re: [rsyslog] gss-api support for rsyslog > > Hi all, > > I have just done a rough review of the patch. From the code point of > view it looks very well. So I have committed it to CVS, its now > available. > > However, I am not yet 100% sure on how it is used. Maybe you can give > me > a jump start with a few notes on how to set it up and what to expect. > That would enable me to better follow the code. And, yes, I know its > all > there in the code... ;) > > Thanks again for your great help. This indeed looks like a very > important addition to rsyslog. > > Rainer > > > On Thu, 2007-11-15 at 11:12 +0100, Peter Vrabec wrote: > > thnx. Rainer, > > > > this is very important functionality for us. If you need any help or > you have > > some questions drop us email. > > > > btw. F8 is out for a week and there are no bug reports on rsyslog, I > hope it > > will continue this way ;-) > > > > peace :-) > > > > On Thursday 15 November 2007 11:02:58 am Rainer Gerhards wrote: > > > In any case, it's a real nice piece of work. I have just returned > from > > > the US (this Monday) and there is still a pile of work I need to > look > > > at. I think next Monday I'll go back to rsyslog and integrating > that > > > patch is probably the #1 thing to do ;) > > _______________________________________________ > > rsyslog mailing list > > http://lists.adiscon.net/mailman/listinfo/rsyslog > > _______________________________________________ > rsyslog mailing list > http://lists.adiscon.net/mailman/listinfo/rsyslog From pvrabec at redhat.com Tue Nov 20 16:09:17 2007 From: pvrabec at redhat.com (Peter Vrabec) Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2007 16:09:17 +0100 Subject: [rsyslog] gss-api support for rsyslog In-Reply-To: <577465F99B41C842AAFBE9ED71E70ABA308482@grfint2.intern.adiscon.com> References: <473B2961.9010705@redhat.com> <1195466915.16341.14.camel@localhost.localdomain> <577465F99B41C842AAFBE9ED71E70ABA308482@grfint2.intern.adiscon.com> Message-ID: <200711201609.18602.pvrabec@redhat.com> in case you need some help setting up krb stuff, here is some info: http://web.mit.edu/kerberos/www/krb5-1.6/ http://cryptnet.net/fdp/admin/kerby-infra/en/kerby-infra.html#install how was our env. set up? just brief instructions: SERVER SIDE (xen41.englab.brq.redhat.com) in WRABCO.ORG realm - running KDC, rsyslog listen to gss connections - 2 principals were added to database: host/xen41.englab.brq.redhat.com at WRABCO.ORG pvrabec at WRABCO.ORG - host/xen41.englab.brq.redhat.com at WRABCO.ORG must be exported to keytab file /etc/krb5.keytab - rsyslog started with -g514 option (not -t option is used) CLIENT SIDE - get ticket from kdc (#kinit pvrabec) - configure rsyslog (/etc/rsyslog.conf) $gssmode encryption *.info;mail.none;authpriv.none;cron.none @@xen41 - start rsyslog - #logger foo On Monday 19 November 2007 03:29:29 pm Rainer Gerhards wrote: > I have uploaded an interim version of the applied-patch-to-version to > > http://download.rsyslog.com/rsyslog/rsyslog-1.19.11.tar.gz > > in case that somebody would like to have an early look at the package. > It still lacks any doc. > > Feedback is appreciated. > > Rainer From rgerhards at hq.adiscon.com Tue Nov 20 16:53:24 2007 From: rgerhards at hq.adiscon.com (Rainer Gerhards) Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2007 16:53:24 +0100 Subject: [rsyslog] gss-api support for rsyslog In-Reply-To: <200711201609.18602.pvrabec@redhat.com> References: <473B2961.9010705@redhat.com><1195466915.16341.14.camel@localhost.localdomain><577465F99B41C842AAFBE9ED71E70ABA308482@grfint2.intern.adiscon.com> <200711201609.18602.pvrabec@redhat.com> Message-ID: <577465F99B41C842AAFBE9ED71E70ABA30848B@grfint2.intern.adiscon.com> Hi Peter, this, as well as the doc, is most helpful. Now that we actually have doc (I thought I'd have to pen it down ;)), I think I will release very shortly, most probably tomorrow. I have thought about setting up a full lab before carrying on. For now, I have decided to NOT do that. I am sure that you folks have tested it quite good and the code that I have seen looks excellent. So I will pull it in as is and wait for some feedback from the field (with the assumption "no feedback" equals "OK"). I will then begin to look at the loadable module de-initialization. This is not really clean in the current release, but that's no problem because modules never get unloaded. However, in the long term we need this to be clean. The mysterios segfault issue is still dangling. I was hesitant to do any larger-scale new development without fixing it. But given the fact that it is extremely hard to find, and obviously happens very seldom, I'll continue developing. I am right now looking into upgrading the dev machine to an x64 OS, where most of the problems happened. My hope is that I will see a segfault during further development work and then hopefully be able to tackle it. I still think that the segfault must be well understood and fixed before I go into some serious multithreading redesign. As such, unfortunately, this issue still holds some of the work scheduled for the next *major* version. I thought I give you an update here in my end (will also post this to the blog for the others). Any feedback/suggestion is highly welcome. Rainer > -----Original Message----- > From: rsyslog-bounces at lists.adiscon.com [mailto:rsyslog- > bounces at lists.adiscon.com] On Behalf Of Peter Vrabec > Sent: Tuesday, November 20, 2007 4:09 PM > To: rsyslog-users > Subject: Re: [rsyslog] gss-api support for rsyslog > > in case you need some help setting up krb stuff, here is some info: > > http://web.mit.edu/kerberos/www/krb5-1.6/ > http://cryptnet.net/fdp/admin/kerby-infra/en/kerby-infra.html#install > > how was our env. set up? just brief instructions: > > SERVER SIDE (xen41.englab.brq.redhat.com) in WRABCO.ORG realm > - running KDC, rsyslog listen to gss connections > - 2 principals were added to database: > host/xen41.englab.brq.redhat.com at WRABCO.ORG > pvrabec at WRABCO.ORG > - host/xen41.englab.brq.redhat.com at WRABCO.ORG must be exported to > keytab > file /etc/krb5.keytab > - rsyslog started with -g514 option (not -t option is used) > > CLIENT SIDE > - get ticket from kdc (#kinit pvrabec) > - configure rsyslog (/etc/rsyslog.conf) > $gssmode encryption > *.info;mail.none;authpriv.none;cron.none @@xen41 > - start rsyslog > - #logger foo > > > On Monday 19 November 2007 03:29:29 pm Rainer Gerhards wrote: > > I have uploaded an interim version of the applied-patch-to-version to > > > > http://download.rsyslog.com/rsyslog/rsyslog-1.19.11.tar.gz > > > > in case that somebody would like to have an early look at the > package. > > It still lacks any doc. > > > > Feedback is appreciated. > > > > Rainer > _______________________________________________ > rsyslog mailing list > http://lists.adiscon.net/mailman/listinfo/rsyslog From pvrabec at redhat.com Tue Nov 20 17:18:11 2007 From: pvrabec at redhat.com (Peter Vrabec) Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2007 17:18:11 +0100 Subject: [rsyslog] gss-api support for rsyslog In-Reply-To: <577465F99B41C842AAFBE9ED71E70ABA30848B@grfint2.intern.adiscon.com> References: <473B2961.9010705@redhat.com> <200711201609.18602.pvrabec@redhat.com> <577465F99B41C842AAFBE9ED71E70ABA30848B@grfint2.intern.adiscon.com> Message-ID: <200711201718.12135.pvrabec@redhat.com> On Tuesday 20 November 2007 04:53:24 pm Rainer Gerhards wrote: > Hi Peter, > > this, as well as the doc, is most helpful. Now that we actually have doc > (I thought I'd have to pen it down ;)), I think I will release very > shortly, most probably tomorrow. doc would be perfect :-) I'm sorry I didn't have time to do it. > I have thought about setting up a full lab before carrying on. For now, > I have decided to NOT do that. I am sure that you folks have tested it > quite good and the code that I have seen looks excellent. > > So I will pull it in as is and wait for some feedback from the field > (with the assumption "no feedback" equals "OK"). hold on, please. There is still some development and we need to make clear in one thing. Here it is: "-g" accepts only gss connections "-t" accepts all connections (gss as a plain text) but, we have a requirement to log both(gss and non-gss). Solutions: 1. -g somePort -t someOtherPort - this might be easy implemented 2. check if the mesaage is gss or not - a bit hackish, since there is no protocol I think patch is OK to release, but I'd like to avoid breaking compatibility in the future. > I will then begin to look at the loadable module de-initialization. This > is not really clean in the current release, but that's no problem > because modules never get unloaded. However, in the long term we need > this to be clean. > > The mysterios segfault issue is still dangling. I was hesitant to do any > larger-scale new development without fixing it. But given the fact that > it is extremely hard to find, and obviously happens very seldom, I'll > continue developing. I am right now looking into upgrading the dev > machine to an x64 OS, where most of the problems happened. My hope is > that I will see a segfault during further development work and then > hopefully be able to tackle it. I still think that the segfault must be > well understood and fixed before I go into some serious multithreading > redesign. As such, unfortunately, this issue still holds some of the > work scheduled for the next *major* version. This bug is my nightmare. I really don't know what to do. I run 2 syslogs in valgrind during a weekend. Sendind message via UDP on 64 architecture, messages generated every 1/3sec. RESULT: no segfault. :-( F8 is out for 2 weeks, we have only one bug report. I released an update to 1.19.10. > I thought I give you an update here in my end (will also post this to > the blog for the others). Any feedback/suggestion is highly welcome. > > Rainer > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: rsyslog-bounces at lists.adiscon.com [mailto:rsyslog- > > bounces at lists.adiscon.com] On Behalf Of Peter Vrabec > > Sent: Tuesday, November 20, 2007 4:09 PM > > To: rsyslog-users > > Subject: Re: [rsyslog] gss-api support for rsyslog > > > > in case you need some help setting up krb stuff, here is some info: > > > > http://web.mit.edu/kerberos/www/krb5-1.6/ > > http://cryptnet.net/fdp/admin/kerby-infra/en/kerby-infra.html#install > > > > how was our env. set up? just brief instructions: > > > > SERVER SIDE (xen41.englab.brq.redhat.com) in WRABCO.ORG realm > > - running KDC, rsyslog listen to gss connections > > - 2 principals were added to database: > > host/xen41.englab.brq.redhat.com at WRABCO.ORG > > pvrabec at WRABCO.ORG > > - host/xen41.englab.brq.redhat.com at WRABCO.ORG must be exported to > > keytab > > file /etc/krb5.keytab > > - rsyslog started with -g514 option (not -t option is used) > > > > CLIENT SIDE > > - get ticket from kdc (#kinit pvrabec) > > - configure rsyslog (/etc/rsyslog.conf) > > $gssmode encryption > > *.info;mail.none;authpriv.none;cron.none @@xen41 > > - start rsyslog > > - #logger foo > > > > On Monday 19 November 2007 03:29:29 pm Rainer Gerhards wrote: > > > I have uploaded an interim version of the applied-patch-to-version > > to > > > > http://download.rsyslog.com/rsyslog/rsyslog-1.19.11.tar.gz > > > > > > in case that somebody would like to have an early look at the > > > > package. > > > > > It still lacks any doc. > > > > > > Feedback is appreciated. > > > > > > Rainer > > > > _______________________________________________ > > rsyslog mailing list > > http://lists.adiscon.net/mailman/listinfo/rsyslog > > _______________________________________________ > rsyslog mailing list > http://lists.adiscon.net/mailman/listinfo/rsyslog From rgerhards at hq.adiscon.com Tue Nov 20 17:21:49 2007 From: rgerhards at hq.adiscon.com (Rainer Gerhards) Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2007 17:21:49 +0100 Subject: [rsyslog] gss-api support for rsyslog In-Reply-To: <200711201718.12135.pvrabec@redhat.com> References: <473B2961.9010705@redhat.com><200711201609.18602.pvrabec@redhat.com><577465F99B41C842AAFBE9ED71E70ABA30848B@grfint2.intern.adiscon.com> <200711201718.12135.pvrabec@redhat.com> Message-ID: <577465F99B41C842AAFBE9ED71E70ABA30848C@grfint2.intern.adiscon.com> > > So I will pull it in as is and wait for some feedback from the field > > (with the assumption "no feedback" equals "OK"). > hold on, please. There is still some development and we need to make > clear in > one thing. Here it is: > "-g" accepts only gss connections > "-t" accepts all connections (gss as a plain text) > but, we have a requirement to log both(gss and non-gss). > Solutions: > 1. -g somePort -t someOtherPort > - this might be easy implemented > > 2. check if the mesaage is gss or not > - a bit hackish, since there is no protocol > > I think patch is OK to release, but I'd like to avoid breaking > compatibility > in the future. OK, valid point. Will hold, a few days don't matter, upward compatibility is more important. > > I will then begin to look at the loadable module de-initialization. > This > > is not really clean in the current release, but that's no problem > > because modules never get unloaded. However, in the long term we need > > this to be clean. > > > > The mysterios segfault issue is still dangling. I was hesitant to do > any > > larger-scale new development without fixing it. But given the fact > that > > it is extremely hard to find, and obviously happens very seldom, I'll > > continue developing. I am right now looking into upgrading the dev > > machine to an x64 OS, where most of the problems happened. My hope is > > that I will see a segfault during further development work and then > > hopefully be able to tackle it. I still think that the segfault must > be > > well understood and fixed before I go into some serious > multithreading > > redesign. As such, unfortunately, this issue still holds some of the > > work scheduled for the next *major* version. > > This bug is my nightmare. I really don't know what to do. I run 2 > syslogs in > valgrind during a weekend. Sendind message via UDP on 64 architecture, > messages generated every 1/3sec. RESULT: no segfault. :-( > > F8 is out for 2 weeks, we have only one bug report. I released an > update to > 1.19.10. My nightmare, too. I have hunted a number of bugs, but this one is really the nastiest I have seen in over 20 years :(. You don't see it in lab, and you don't see it in code review. And the worst thing is that I have no clue left what may be the issue - besides that it is related to threading. But the threading model is that simple... Rainer From janfrode at tanso.net Wed Nov 21 09:53:20 2007 From: janfrode at tanso.net (Jan-Frode Myklebust) Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2007 09:53:20 +0100 Subject: [rsyslog] gss-api support for rsyslog References: <473B2961.9010705@redhat.com> <200711201609.18602.pvrabec@redhat.com> <577465F99B41C842AAFBE9ED71E70ABA30848B@grfint2.intern.adiscon.com> <200711201718.12135.pvrabec@redhat.com> Message-ID: On 2007-11-20, Peter Vrabec wrote: > > This bug is my nightmare. I really don't know what to do. I run 2 syslogs in > valgrind during a weekend. Sendind message via UDP on 64 architecture, > messages generated every 1/3sec. RESULT: no segfault. :-( I'd just like to again point out that we're seeing this regularly on *32-bit* RHEL5. It's a quite heavily loaded server (1-2 GB udp-syslogs a day), and it's been failing at these times: Mon Sep 3 01:25:05 2007 Mon Sep 3 15:54:19 2007 Tue Sep 4 23:16:05 2007 Thu Sep 6 20:38:05 2007 Fri Sep 7 03:27:19 2007 Sat Sep 8 06:42:34 2007 Mon Sep 10 21:57:35 2007 Thu Sep 13 11:06:49 2007 Fri Sep 14 08:59:50 2007 Fri Sep 14 14:41:04 2007 Sat Sep 15 14:17:05 2007 Sun Sep 16 09:10:49 2007 Sun Sep 16 15:43:34 2007 Mon Sep 17 22:00:04 2007 Thu Sep 20 17:43:19 2007 Fri Sep 21 17:27:49 2007 Sun Sep 23 05:32:49 2007 Sun Sep 23 15:18:49 2007 Mon Sep 24 11:37:49 2007 Mon Sep 24 12:31:04 2007 Mon Sep 24 23:29:19 2007 # upgraded to rsyslog-1.19.8-1, running with MALLOC_CHECK_=2 Thu Sep 27 14:18:48 2007 Fri Sep 28 21:10:17 2007 Fri Oct 5 06:54:02 2007 Fri Oct 26 14:26:08 2007 Sun Nov 4 08:55:22 2007 Wed Nov 7 17:15:52 2007 Sat Nov 10 03:09:38 2007 Sat Nov 10 20:07:07 2007 So, with 1.19.8-1 it's gotten quite a bit better for us. Unfortunately I haven't been able to get any core dumps, even with DAEMON_COREFILE_LIMIT='unlimited' in /etc/sysconfig/rsyslog and doing a "cd /var/log/syslog" before starting rsyslogd in the init-script. Is there anything else we need to do to get coredumps ? -jf From pvrabec at redhat.com Wed Nov 21 14:32:21 2007 From: pvrabec at redhat.com (Peter Vrabec) Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2007 14:32:21 +0100 Subject: [rsyslog] gss-api support for rsyslog In-Reply-To: References: <473B2961.9010705@redhat.com> <200711201718.12135.pvrabec@redhat.com> Message-ID: <200711211432.21492.pvrabec@redhat.com> Hi Jan, thnx. for info. Could you try latest release, please. You can get src.rpm from fedora mirrors: ftp://mirror.colorado.edu/pub/fedora/linux/updates/8/SRPMS/rsyslog-1.19.10-1.fc8.src.rpm Could you send your /proc/cpuinfo? Do you use network logging? We try our best to reproduce the problem. On Wednesday 21 November 2007 09:53:20 am Jan-Frode Myklebust wrote: > On 2007-11-20, Peter Vrabec wrote: > > This bug is my nightmare. I really don't know what to do. I run 2 > > syslogs in valgrind during a weekend. Sendind message via UDP on 64 > > architecture, messages generated every 1/3sec. RESULT: no segfault. :-( > > I'd just like to again point out that we're seeing this regularly > on *32-bit* RHEL5. It's a quite heavily loaded server (1-2 GB udp-syslogs a > day), and it's been failing at these times: > > _______________________________________________ > rsyslog mailing list > http://lists.adiscon.net/mailman/listinfo/rsyslog From pvrabec at redhat.com Thu Nov 22 13:59:08 2007 From: pvrabec at redhat.com (Peter Vrabec) Date: Thu, 22 Nov 2007 13:59:08 +0100 Subject: [rsyslog] rsyslog-example.conf Message-ID: <200711221359.08874.pvrabec@redhat.com> Hi, would it be possible to provide some example rsyslog.conf file and install it with doc/*html? http://people.redhat.com/pvrabec/rpms/rsyslog/rsyslog-example.conf Also, note about it in rsyslog.conf.5 would be OK. Your opinions? From rgerhards at hq.adiscon.com Thu Nov 22 14:19:07 2007 From: rgerhards at hq.adiscon.com (Rainer Gerhards) Date: Thu, 22 Nov 2007 14:19:07 +0100 Subject: [rsyslog] rsyslog-example.conf In-Reply-To: <200711221359.08874.pvrabec@redhat.com> References: <200711221359.08874.pvrabec@redhat.com> Message-ID: <577465F99B41C842AAFBE9ED71E70ABA3084B7@grfint2.intern.adiscon.com> Nice sample :). I'll add it to the next release. BTW: I am thinking about releasing a new version with the GSS-API version as is, BUT with a warning that it should not yet be used for production, due to not-yet-solved compatibility issues. Any hard objections? Rainer PS: I need to attend a meeting, will probably not be online until much later or tomorrow morning... > -----Original Message----- > From: rsyslog-bounces at lists.adiscon.com [mailto:rsyslog- > bounces at lists.adiscon.com] On Behalf Of Peter Vrabec > Sent: Thursday, November 22, 2007 1:59 PM > To: rsyslog-users > Subject: [rsyslog] rsyslog-example.conf > > Hi, > > would it be possible to provide some example rsyslog.conf file and > install it > with doc/*html? > > http://people.redhat.com/pvrabec/rpms/rsyslog/rsyslog-example.conf > > Also, note about it in rsyslog.conf.5 would be OK. > > Your opinions? > > _______________________________________________ > rsyslog mailing list > http://lists.adiscon.net/mailman/listinfo/rsyslog From pvrabec at redhat.com Thu Nov 22 14:30:06 2007 From: pvrabec at redhat.com (Peter Vrabec) Date: Thu, 22 Nov 2007 14:30:06 +0100 Subject: [rsyslog] rsyslog-example.conf In-Reply-To: <577465F99B41C842AAFBE9ED71E70ABA3084B7@grfint2.intern.adiscon.com> References: <200711221359.08874.pvrabec@redhat.com> <577465F99B41C842AAFBE9ED71E70ABA3084B7@grfint2.intern.adiscon.com> Message-ID: <200711221430.06511.pvrabec@redhat.com> On Thursday 22 November 2007 02:19:07 pm Rainer Gerhards wrote: > Nice sample :). I'll add it to the next release. > > BTW: I am thinking about releasing a new version with the GSS-API > version as is, BUT with a warning that it should not yet be used for > production, due to not-yet-solved compatibility issues. Any hard > objections? I won't push it at the moment. "-g" option will behave differently in the future, therefore I prefer to wait till theinric implement it. From rgerhards at hq.adiscon.com Tue Nov 27 10:54:56 2007 From: rgerhards at hq.adiscon.com (Rainer Gerhards) Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2007 10:54:56 +0100 Subject: [rsyslog] Looking for bughunters... Message-ID: <577465F99B41C842AAFBE9ED71E70ABA3084F1@grfint2.intern.adiscon.com> Hi all, we are still working to hunt down the unfortunate and extremely hard-to-find (to say the least...) segfault issue that some experience. Peter Vrabec has created a great new RPM with debugging support. We would appreciate if those of you experiencing the problem could give it a try. Full information can be found on the rsyslog site at http://www.rsyslog.com/Article139.phtml Your help is deeply appreciated! Thanks, Rainer PS: as a reminder, I do more in-depth reports of what is happening in my blog at http://rgerhards.blogspot.com - you may be interested to follow it. I do this so that I do not pollute the mailing list with too-in-depth information. Thanks. From rgerhards at hq.adiscon.com Tue Nov 27 15:45:29 2007 From: rgerhards at hq.adiscon.com (Rainer Gerhards) Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2007 15:45:29 +0100 Subject: [rsyslog] segfault bug Message-ID: <577465F99B41C842AAFBE9ED71E70ABA3084FC@grfint2.intern.adiscon.com> Hi all, I have just elaborated on my leading theory of the segfault bug being related to a threading issue: http://rgerhards.blogspot.com/2007/11/found-another-part-of-code-that-is -not.html However, I'd like to double check: As far as I have tracked, everyone who experienced the segfault issue is running rsyslog in multi-threading mode (the default). A few have changed to single-threading mode (via ./configure --disable-pthreads) and then the problem disappeared. So I'd like to ask if someone RUNNING rsyslogd in SINGLE THREADING mode has experienced a segfault. This is very vital information, because it effectively pinpoints the trouble source... Feedback is appreciated. Thanks, Rainer From hagen at rz.uni-karlsruhe.de Tue Nov 27 16:31:00 2007 From: hagen at rz.uni-karlsruhe.de (Patrick von der Hagen) Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2007 16:31:00 +0100 Subject: [rsyslog] Looking for bughunters... In-Reply-To: <577465F99B41C842AAFBE9ED71E70ABA3084F1@grfint2.intern.adiscon.com> References: <577465F99B41C842AAFBE9ED71E70ABA3084F1@grfint2.intern.adiscon.com> Message-ID: <1196177460.3967.11.camel@rzm-hagen-lt.rz.uni-karlsruhe.de> Am Dienstag, den 27.11.2007, 10:54 +0100 schrieb Rainer Gerhards: [...] > Your help is deeply appreciated! Short: won't work out of the box on RHEL5.1. Long: Download of RPM to RHEL5.1, installed libmudflap and libmudflabp-devel, build and installed rsyslog, did not install the mysql-package. Felt annoyed when I realised that the package moved /etc/rsyslog.conf to /etc/rsyslog.conf.rpmnew and copied a new configuration to /etc/rsyslog.conf. Changed back to my old configuration. Did "/sbin/rsyslogd -n -o -r514 -m 0". The daemon starts and that's it. Killed it, did "/opt/rsyslog/sbin/rsyslogd -n -o -r514 -m 0" (the "original 1.19.10") and it logged fine. So both the command-line and the config seem to be valid. But the modified rsyslog+mudflap just sits there in a loop, waiting for something to happen (according to strace). open("/etc/hosts", O_RDONLY) = 8 fcntl(8, F_GETFD) = 0 fcntl(8, F_SETFD, FD_CLOEXEC) = 0 fstat(8, {st_mode=S_IFREG|0644, st_size=234, ...}) = 0 mmap(NULL, 4096, PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE, MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_ANONYMOUS, -1, 0) = 0x2aaaaaaad000 read(8, "# Do not remove the following li"..., 4096) = 234 read(8, "", 4096) = 0 close(8) = 0 munmap(0x2aaaaaaad000, 4096) = 0 open("/etc/ld.so.cache", O_RDONLY) = 8 fstat(8, {st_mode=S_IFREG|0644, st_size=135025, ...}) = 0 mmap(NULL, 135025, PROT_READ, MAP_PRIVATE, 8, 0) = 0x2aaaaae7e000 close(8) = 0 open("/lib64/libnss_dns.so.2", O_RDONLY) = 8 read(8, "\177ELF\2\1\1\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\3\0>\0\1\0\0\0\240\17\0\0\0\0\0 \0"..., 832) = 832 futex(0x2aaaaacea840, FUTEX_WAIT, 2, NULL) = -1 EINTR (Interrupted system call) --- SIGWINCH (Window changed) @ 0 (0) --- futex(0x2aaaaacea840, FUTEX_WAIT, 2, NULL) = -1 EINTR (Interrupted system call) --- SIGWINCH (Window changed) @ 0 (0) --- futex(0x2aaaaacea840, FUTEX_WAIT, 2, NULL) = -1 EINTR (Interrupted system call) --- SIGWINCH (Window changed) @ 0 (0) --- futex(0x2aaaaacea840, FUTEX_WAIT, 2, NULL Last lines indicate some DNS-problem and in fact adding "-x" to the commandline helps. Now I'm waiting for the next crash to send my output^. -- CU, Patrick. From rgerhards at hq.adiscon.com Thu Nov 29 11:05:38 2007 From: rgerhards at hq.adiscon.com (Rainer Gerhards) Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2007 11:05:38 +0100 Subject: [rsyslog] rsyslog 1.19.11 released Message-ID: <577465F99B41C842AAFBE9ED71E70ABA30851F@grfint2.intern.adiscon.com> Hi all, in the effort to fix the segfault bug, I have just released 1.19.11 of rsyslog. There is a single, minimal, change in that release: an additional compiler option is set. In short, the "-pthread" option was missing and it may be the reason for the segfault. The longer story is here: http://rgerhards.blogspot.com/2007/11/did-i-find-rsyslog-bug.html I released a new version to make sure new users will find the fixed result set. Setting that option definitely doesn't hurt. The question now is if it helps. So... if you experience the segfault AND you are NOT running the instrumented build created by Peter Vrabec, I'd appreciate if you could update and let me know the results. If you run Peter's version AND have experienced and reported a segfault, I'll also kindly ask you to upgrade to the new version and see what happens. If you run Peter's version AND have not yet experienced a segfault with it, I'd prefer if you could continue running it, at least for a while. Even though I may have found the bug, there is still no solid evidence and a report from Peter's version may help provide that evidence. If you DO NOT experience a segfault, there is no point in upgrading. Save yourself the time ;) Download location: http://www.rsyslog.com/Downloads-req-getit-lid-63.phtml Many thanks to all for your collaboration on this issue. Your help is deeply appreciated. Many thanks, Rainer From hagen at rz.uni-karlsruhe.de Thu Nov 29 12:18:56 2007 From: hagen at rz.uni-karlsruhe.de (Patrick von der Hagen) Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2007 12:18:56 +0100 Subject: [rsyslog] Looking for bughunters... In-Reply-To: <1196177460.3967.11.camel@rzm-hagen-lt.rz.uni-karlsruhe.de> References: <577465F99B41C842AAFBE9ED71E70ABA3084F1@grfint2.intern.adiscon.com> <1196177460.3967.11.camel@rzm-hagen-lt.rz.uni-karlsruhe.de> Message-ID: <1196335136.3867.17.camel@rzm-hagen-lt.rz.uni-karlsruhe.de> Am Dienstag, den 27.11.2007, 16:31 +0100 schrieb Patrick von der Hagen: [...] > Last lines indicate some DNS-problem and in fact adding "-x" to the > commandline helps. Now I'm waiting for the next crash to send my > output^. No crash so far. The load is noticably higher, but still acceptable. Now I killed the debugging-release and used precisely the same commandline to start the regular release, which caused some crashes here. As I mentioned the debugging-release had some problems with DNS, so I can't run it the same way I usually try to run rsyslog. So I'm not quite sure wheter or not the results can actually be compared. Anyway, I'll try the new command-line with 1.19.10 first, if that crashes I'll switch to 1.19.11. -- CU, Patrick. From rgerhards at hq.adiscon.com Thu Nov 29 12:20:50 2007 From: rgerhards at hq.adiscon.com (Rainer Gerhards) Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2007 12:20:50 +0100 Subject: [rsyslog] Looking for bughunters... In-Reply-To: <1196335136.3867.17.camel@rzm-hagen-lt.rz.uni-karlsruhe.de> References: <577465F99B41C842AAFBE9ED71E70ABA3084F1@grfint2.intern.adiscon.com><1196177460.3967.11.camel@rzm-hagen-lt.rz.uni-karlsruhe.de> <1196335136.3867.17.camel@rzm-hagen-lt.rz.uni-karlsruhe.de> Message-ID: <577465F99B41C842AAFBE9ED71E70ABA308527@grfint2.intern.adiscon.com> Patrick, excellent, many thanks. We stay tuned for updates. I am very hopeful for the compiler switch issue... Rainer > -----Original Message----- > From: rsyslog-bounces at lists.adiscon.com [mailto:rsyslog- > bounces at lists.adiscon.com] On Behalf Of Patrick von der Hagen > Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2007 12:19 PM > To: rsyslog-users > Subject: Re: [rsyslog] Looking for bughunters... > > Am Dienstag, den 27.11.2007, 16:31 +0100 schrieb Patrick von der Hagen: > [...] > > Last lines indicate some DNS-problem and in fact adding "-x" to the > > commandline helps. Now I'm waiting for the next crash to send my > > output^. > No crash so far. The load is noticably higher, but still acceptable. > Now I killed the debugging-release and used precisely the same > commandline to start the regular release, which caused some crashes > here. > As I mentioned the debugging-release had some problems with DNS, so I > can't run it the same way I usually try to run rsyslog. So I'm not > quite > sure wheter or not the results can actually be compared. > Anyway, I'll try the new command-line with 1.19.10 first, if that > crashes I'll switch to 1.19.11. > > -- > CU, > Patrick. > _______________________________________________ > rsyslog mailing list > http://lists.adiscon.net/mailman/listinfo/rsyslog From pvrabec at redhat.com Thu Nov 29 12:35:31 2007 From: pvrabec at redhat.com (Peter Vrabec) Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2007 12:35:31 +0100 Subject: [rsyslog] rsyslog 1.19.11 released In-Reply-To: <577465F99B41C842AAFBE9ED71E70ABA30851F@grfint2.intern.adiscon.com> References: <577465F99B41C842AAFBE9ED71E70ABA30851F@grfint2.intern.adiscon.com> Message-ID: <200711291235.31902.pvrabec@redhat.com> Peter's version update: http://people.redhat.com/pvrabec/rpms/rsyslog/rsyslog-1.19.11-1.mudflap.src.rpm From mbiebl at gmail.com Fri Nov 30 11:15:18 2007 From: mbiebl at gmail.com (Michael Biebl) Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2007 11:15:18 +0100 Subject: [rsyslog] rsyslog 1.19.11 released In-Reply-To: <577465F99B41C842AAFBE9ED71E70ABA30851F@grfint2.intern.adiscon.com> References: <577465F99B41C842AAFBE9ED71E70ABA30851F@grfint2.intern.adiscon.com> Message-ID: 2007/11/29, Rainer Gerhards : > Hi all, > > in the effort to fix the segfault bug, I have just released 1.19.11 of > rsyslog. There is a single, minimal, change in that release: an > additional compiler option is set. In short, the "-pthread" option was > missing and it may be the reason for the segfault. The longer story is There is a small problem: pthreads_libs, as used in rsyslogd_LDADD, is not set anymore. The attached patch fixes that. I also used a separate pthreads_cflags variable which is assigned to rsyslogd_CPPFLAGS. It's cleaner than overwriting the global CFLAGS variable. Please review. Cheers, Michael -- Why is it that all of the instruments seeking intelligent life in the universe are pointed away from Earth? From hagen at rz.uni-karlsruhe.de Fri Nov 30 11:24:26 2007 From: hagen at rz.uni-karlsruhe.de (Patrick von der Hagen) Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2007 11:24:26 +0100 Subject: [rsyslog] Looking for bughunters... In-Reply-To: <1196335136.3867.17.camel@rzm-hagen-lt.rz.uni-karlsruhe.de> References: <577465F99B41C842AAFBE9ED71E70ABA3084F1@grfint2.intern.adiscon.com> <1196177460.3967.11.camel@rzm-hagen-lt.rz.uni-karlsruhe.de> <1196335136.3867.17.camel@rzm-hagen-lt.rz.uni-karlsruhe.de> Message-ID: <1196418266.4479.1.camel@rzm-hagen-lt.rz.uni-karlsruhe.de> Hi all, just a small update: 1.19.10-debug worked for two days without problems. 1.19.10 crashed after 5 hours. Now I'll give 1.19.11 a try.... -- CU, Patrick. From rgerhards at hq.adiscon.com Fri Nov 30 11:26:25 2007 From: rgerhards at hq.adiscon.com (Rainer Gerhards) Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2007 11:26:25 +0100 Subject: [rsyslog] Looking for bughunters... In-Reply-To: <1196418266.4479.1.camel@rzm-hagen-lt.rz.uni-karlsruhe.de> References: <577465F99B41C842AAFBE9ED71E70ABA3084F1@grfint2.intern.adiscon.com><1196177460.3967.11.camel@rzm-hagen-lt.rz.uni-karlsruhe.de><1196335136.3867.17.camel@rzm-hagen-lt.rz.uni-karlsruhe.de> <1196418266.4479.1.camel@rzm-hagen-lt.rz.uni-karlsruhe.de> Message-ID: <577465F99B41C842AAFBE9ED71E70ABA308552@grfint2.intern.adiscon.com> Patrick, ok - even though this sounds somewhat silly, I think this is good news. It is evidence that the problem is not related to the option. That, too, points into the direction of a threading issue, so it is consistent with former findings. What I now hope is that the rest of the analysis is true, too. In that case, 1.19.11 should work... Thanks for all your help. Much appreciated. Rainer > -----Original Message----- > From: rsyslog-bounces at lists.adiscon.com [mailto:rsyslog- > bounces at lists.adiscon.com] On Behalf Of Patrick von der Hagen > Sent: Friday, November 30, 2007 11:24 AM > To: rsyslog-users > Subject: Re: [rsyslog] Looking for bughunters... > > Hi all, > > just a small update: 1.19.10-debug worked for two days without > problems. > 1.19.10 crashed after 5 hours. > Now I'll give 1.19.11 a try.... > > -- > CU, > Patrick. > _______________________________________________ > rsyslog mailing list > http://lists.adiscon.net/mailman/listinfo/rsyslog From rgerhards at hq.adiscon.com Fri Nov 30 11:29:45 2007 From: rgerhards at hq.adiscon.com (Rainer Gerhards) Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2007 11:29:45 +0100 Subject: [rsyslog] rsyslog 1.19.11 released In-Reply-To: References: <577465F99B41C842AAFBE9ED71E70ABA30851F@grfint2.intern.adiscon.com> Message-ID: <577465F99B41C842AAFBE9ED71E70ABA308554@grfint2.intern.adiscon.com> Ah, excellent. Once more I have to admit that I am not a tools guy ;) And, as usual, the mailing list is very picky - the attachment was stripped. Can you send it via private mail, I can host it on rsyslog.com. Rainer > -----Original Message----- > From: rsyslog-bounces at lists.adiscon.com [mailto:rsyslog- > bounces at lists.adiscon.com] On Behalf Of Michael Biebl > Sent: Friday, November 30, 2007 11:15 AM > To: rsyslog-users > Subject: Re: [rsyslog] rsyslog 1.19.11 released > > 2007/11/29, Rainer Gerhards : > > Hi all, > > > > in the effort to fix the segfault bug, I have just released 1.19.11 > of > > rsyslog. There is a single, minimal, change in that release: an > > additional compiler option is set. In short, the "-pthread" option > was > > missing and it may be the reason for the segfault. The longer story > is > > There is a small problem: > pthreads_libs, as used in rsyslogd_LDADD, is not set anymore. > The attached patch fixes that. > I also used a separate pthreads_cflags variable which is assigned to > rsyslogd_CPPFLAGS. It's cleaner than overwriting the global CFLAGS > variable. > > Please review. > > Cheers, > Michael > > > -- > Why is it that all of the instruments seeking intelligent life in the > universe are pointed away from Earth? From mbiebl at gmail.com Fri Nov 30 12:02:29 2007 From: mbiebl at gmail.com (Michael Biebl) Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2007 12:02:29 +0100 Subject: [rsyslog] rsyslog 1.19.11 released In-Reply-To: <577465F99B41C842AAFBE9ED71E70ABA308554@grfint2.intern.adiscon.com> References: <577465F99B41C842AAFBE9ED71E70ABA30851F@grfint2.intern.adiscon.com> <577465F99B41C842AAFBE9ED71E70ABA308554@grfint2.intern.adiscon.com> Message-ID: 2007/11/30, Rainer Gerhards : > And, as usual, the mailing list is very picky - the attachment was > stripped. Can you send it via private mail, I can host it on > rsyslog.com. Oh, sorry. I forgot... Here it is: http://debs.michaelbiebl.de/rsyslog/0001-pthreads-cflags-proper.patch Cheers, MIchael -- Why is it that all of the instruments seeking intelligent life in the universe are pointed away from Earth? From mbiebl at gmail.com Fri Nov 30 13:35:38 2007 From: mbiebl at gmail.com (Michael Biebl) Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2007 13:35:38 +0100 Subject: [rsyslog] Please remove autogenerated files from CVS Message-ID: Hi, aclocal.m4 and depcomp are automatically created when I build the autotools support (by running autoreconf -vfi), so they should be removed from CVS. Most developers will have different version of autoconf/automake, so these files will be listed as modified, which is a bit annoying. Having .cvsignore files would be nice, too: == .cvsignore == .deps .libs Makefile Makefile.in autom4te.cache config.guess config.h config.h.in config.log config.status config.sub configure libtool ltmain.sh aclocal.m4 depcomp stamp-h1 rfc3195d rklogd rsyslogd == doc/.cvsignore == Makefile Makefile.in == plugins/ommysql/.cvsignore == .deps .libs Makefile Makefile.in ommysql.la ommysql_la-ommysql.lo Cheers, Michael -- Why is it that all of the instruments seeking intelligent life in the universe are pointed away from Earth? From rgerhards at hq.adiscon.com Fri Nov 30 14:16:13 2007 From: rgerhards at hq.adiscon.com (Rainer Gerhards) Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2007 14:16:13 +0100 Subject: [rsyslog] Please remove autogenerated files from CVS In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <577465F99B41C842AAFBE9ED71E70ABA308555@grfint2.intern.adiscon.com> Michael, thanks again for the good advise. Patch applied, files removed, committed to cvs. Note that I branched for 1.19.11, because there are already a number of changes in what will become 1.20.1 (GSS-API, clean module unload interface). The branch for 1.19.11 and above is v1-19-1_branch. I thought it would contain just one release ;) Rainer > -----Original Message----- > From: rsyslog-bounces at lists.adiscon.com [mailto:rsyslog- > bounces at lists.adiscon.com] On Behalf Of Michael Biebl > Sent: Friday, November 30, 2007 1:36 PM > To: rsyslog-users > Subject: [rsyslog] Please remove autogenerated files from CVS > > Hi, > > aclocal.m4 and depcomp are automatically created when I build the > autotools support (by running autoreconf -vfi), so they should be > removed from CVS. > Most developers will have different version of autoconf/automake, so > these files will be listed as modified, which is a bit annoying. > > Having .cvsignore files would be nice, too: > == .cvsignore == > .deps > .libs > Makefile > Makefile.in > autom4te.cache > config.guess > config.h > config.h.in > config.log > config.status > config.sub > configure > libtool > ltmain.sh > aclocal.m4 > depcomp > stamp-h1 > rfc3195d > rklogd > rsyslogd > > == doc/.cvsignore == > Makefile > Makefile.in > > == plugins/ommysql/.cvsignore == > .deps > .libs > Makefile > Makefile.in > ommysql.la > ommysql_la-ommysql.lo > > > Cheers, > Michael > -- > Why is it that all of the instruments seeking intelligent life in the > universe are pointed away from Earth? > _______________________________________________ > rsyslog mailing list > http://lists.adiscon.net/mailman/listinfo/rsyslog From rgerhards at hq.adiscon.com Fri Nov 30 14:31:36 2007 From: rgerhards at hq.adiscon.com (Rainer Gerhards) Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2007 14:31:36 +0100 Subject: [rsyslog] rsyslog 1.19.11 released In-Reply-To: References: <577465F99B41C842AAFBE9ED71E70ABA30851F@grfint2.intern.adiscon.com><577465F99B41C842AAFBE9ED71E70ABA308554@grfint2.intern.adiscon.com> Message-ID: <577465F99B41C842AAFBE9ED71E70ABA308556@grfint2.intern.adiscon.com> I just noticed one other thing: the ommysql.c is being generated by its own makefile (we changed that a few releases down the road). However, that means that makefile must also be compiled with -pthread - otherwise, run time library calls in it may fail on reentrancy. I am right now changing this. I will not re-issue the release. Will do together with the other things as 1.19.12, but let's wait for some feedback first... Rainer > -----Original Message----- > From: rsyslog-bounces at lists.adiscon.com [mailto:rsyslog- > bounces at lists.adiscon.com] On Behalf Of Michael Biebl > Sent: Friday, November 30, 2007 12:02 PM > To: rsyslog-users > Subject: Re: [rsyslog] rsyslog 1.19.11 released > > 2007/11/30, Rainer Gerhards : > > And, as usual, the mailing list is very picky - the attachment was > > stripped. Can you send it via private mail, I can host it on > > rsyslog.com. > > Oh, sorry. I forgot... > Here it is: > http://debs.michaelbiebl.de/rsyslog/0001-pthreads-cflags-proper.patch > > Cheers, > MIchael > > -- > Why is it that all of the instruments seeking intelligent life in the > universe are pointed away from Earth? > _______________________________________________ > rsyslog mailing list > http://lists.adiscon.net/mailman/listinfo/rsyslog