[rsyslog] 1.19.6 updated
rgerhards at hq.adiscon.com
Tue Sep 11 18:40:12 CEST 2007
Ahhh... I have to admit that I currently do not really care about
rfc3195d. Currently, RFC 3195 is a failure - nobody uses it and nobody
asks for it. I've stopped testing it until I receive at least one
real-world implementation note.
Thanks for the info, will apply a patch. And, yes, I do not think that
3195 is totally dead. There is a new revision planned, and that may be
very interesting. This is why I am not ditching it...
> -----Original Message-----
> From: rsyslog-bounces at lists.adiscon.com [mailto:rsyslog-
> bounces at lists.adiscon.com] On Behalf Of Andrew Pantyukhin
> Sent: Tuesday, September 11, 2007 6:05 PM
> To: rsyslog-users
> Subject: Re: [rsyslog] 1.19.6 updated
> On Tue, Sep 11, 2007 at 05:46:54PM +0200, Rainer Gerhards wrote:
> > Just for your info: I detected one bug that occurred during bug
> > I fixed it and re-published 1.19.6 with the same version number
> > I saw now downloads until then. But maybe my counter is wrong. If
> > have downloaded rsyslog before I sent this message, please re-
> > it.
> > Sorry for the hassle, but that fix was probably worth it.
> I had to run 's/sigaction_t/sigaction/' over rfc3195d.c in order
> to compile it on FreeBSD. Otherwise it seems to work. Thanks!
> rsyslog mailing list
More information about the rsyslog