[rsyslog] openssl vs rsyslog

[Rainer Gerhards]

Whatever I do - I'll try to create a small driver shim so that hopefully
different libraries could be used together with rsyslog. It depends on
the APIs, but in general that should not be too hard (but practice often
tells the difference).

On FIPS I made I comment, where I think the mails crossed.

Rainer 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: rsyslog-bounces at lists.adiscon.com 
> [mailto:rsyslog-bounces at lists.adiscon.com] On Behalf Of Michael Biebl
> Sent: Monday, March 31, 2008 9:27 PM
> To: rsyslog-users
> Subject: Re: [rsyslog] openssl vs rsyslog
> 
> 2008/3/31, seth vidal <skvidal at fedoraproject.org>:
> > On Mon, 2008-03-31 at 21:18 +0200, Michael Biebl wrote:
> >  > Interesting to know. Do you know any technical 
> advantages of NSS over
> >  > GnuTLS (stability, features, nicer API, etc)?
> >
> >
> > openssl transition library
> >  fips certification.
> >
> >  http://www.mozilla.org/projects/security/pki/nss/fips/
> >
> >  the second one being the most important, I think.
> 
> Yeah, the openssl transition library doesn't concern us.
> 
> Why is the fips certification important for rsyslog?
> 
> Cheers,
> Michael
> 
> -- 
> Why is it that all of the instruments seeking intelligent life in the
> universe are pointed away from Earth?
> _______________________________________________
> rsyslog mailing list
> http://lists.adiscon.net/mailman/listinfo/rsyslog
>