[rsyslog] A question about message size
Patrick Shen
patrick.shen at net-m.de
Wed Sep 24 13:48:04 CEST 2008
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Thanks for your explanation.
Best regards,
Patrick
Rainer Gerhards wrote:
> Yes, that's right and that's the only solution for v3-stable.
>
> I haven't merged that change into the stable branch because, among all
> of the changes done, this one is among those with the greatest potential
> to break things. You do not want to have that in v3-stable (just to note
> that backporting it is definitely not a good idea ;)).
>
> Rainer
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: rsyslog-bounces at lists.adiscon.com [mailto:rsyslog-
>> bounces at lists.adiscon.com] On Behalf Of Patrick Shen
>> Sent: Wednesday, September 24, 2008 10:57 AM
>> To: rsyslog-users
>> Subject: [rsyslog] A question about message size
>>
> Hi Rainer,
>
> Now I am running latest V3 stable (3.18.4) on my company production
> machine. We couldn't upgrade to >=3.21.4 to get the benefit of dynamic
> setting MESSAGE size due to company policy.
>
> But we need 4K for message size not 2K by default. So I changed
>> MAXLINE
> definition in syslogd.h from 2048 to 4096.
>
> Is it correct? And do we have any other solutions with 3.18.4 ?
>
> Many thanks,
>
_______________________________________________
rsyslog mailing list
http://lists.adiscon.net/mailman/listinfo/rsyslog
> _______________________________________________
> rsyslog mailing list
> http://lists.adiscon.net/mailman/listinfo/rsyslog
- --
Patrick Shen
Operations Engineer
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iEYEARECAAYFAkjaKPQACgkQkHhYtFevC+NsSACgiur1TmRgsFmE7qs8ff1c/xGF
ifUAn2miAH8ILxk6KUiT2geoVRYXee/O
=3pVu
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
More information about the rsyslog
mailing list