[rsyslog] reliability of SSD disks?
rgerhards at hq.adiscon.com
Thu Aug 20 08:51:59 CEST 2009
> -----Original Message-----
> From: rsyslog-bounces at lists.adiscon.com [mailto:rsyslog-
> bounces at lists.adiscon.com] On Behalf Of david at lang.hm
> Sent: Donnerstag, 20. August 2009 05:14
> To: rsyslog-users
> Subject: Re: [rsyslog] reliability of SSD disks?
> On Wed, 19 Aug 2009, Aaron Wiebe wrote:
> > SSD's are as reliable, if not more reliable, than your regular
> spinning rust.
> > But if you want to get even more speed, and just as much reliability,
> > check out fusionio.com. They're launching a consumer market PCIe
> > at 80GB this year (at $800 a card). The technology is -very- cool
> > though, I got a presentation about it this week (and met the woz!).
> I have one of their cards, at the moment they are no faster than a
> SSD for rsyslog (in large part due to bottlenecks in rsyslog).
The bottleneck is due to the frequent file open/closes in ultra-reliable
mode, I assume? Or anything else?
PS: BTW: thanks everyone for all the good info. It is very interesting to me.
I actually was concerned about the write cycles, but as it looks this seems
to be far less of a concern than I initially thought.
More information about the rsyslog