[rsyslog] rsyslog v5 5.2.0
Rainer Gerhards
rgerhards at hq.adiscon.com
Thu Nov 5 16:53:34 CET 2009
> -----Original Message-----
> From: rsyslog-bounces at lists.adiscon.com [mailto:rsyslog-
> bounces at lists.adiscon.com] On Behalf Of Michael Biebl
> Sent: Thursday, November 05, 2009 4:50 PM
> To: rsyslog-users
> Subject: Re: [rsyslog] rsyslog v5 5.2.0
>
> 2009/11/4 Rainer Gerhards <rgerhards at hq.adiscon.com>:
> > Michael,
> >
> > That is very probably the same regression that Luis Fernando
> mentioned for
> > 4.5.5. All in all, I would be quite careful with 5.2.0, I really have
> the
> > impression that folks simply didn't try it out. But as I wrote, I
> need to
> > somehow get the process started to come to make v5 mainstream. It is
> really
> > important to me to get rid of v4-devel, as it takes considerable time
> (and
> > bug potential!) to have two branches that are in development state.
>
> I can confirm that a5cd509be736fcff3c8ae3104712d2fe85776416 fixes this
> issue for me using 5.2.0.
> What about the -c compat flag? Is it intentional that there is no -c 5?
> I will probably upload a 5.2.* to unstable (or experimental) soon,
> which should give it some wider exposure.
I'll look into that, soon. My hopes are to get past 5.2.0 as quickly as
possible. I have done a lot of work on the queue engine in the recent
development version and there are definitely a couple of issues in 5.2.0
which cannot be fixed without upgrading the 5.3 version. That just FYI. I
will probably not work on any queue-related issues in 5.2 but rather
recommend to move on to a newer version. However, for normal operations that
do not require intensive use of the queues, 5.2.0 should work OK and be
faster than pervious versions.
Rainer
> Cheers,
> Michael
>
>
> > Rainer
> >
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: rsyslog-bounces at lists.adiscon.com
> >> [mailto:rsyslog-bounces at lists.adiscon.com] On Behalf Of Michael
> Biebl
> >> Sent: Wednesday, November 04, 2009 7:30 PM
> >> To: rsyslog-users
> >> Subject: [rsyslog] rsyslog v5 5.2.0
> >>
> >> Hi Rainer, hi list
> >>
> >> I tried the latest v5 stable release.
> >> First thing I noticed is, that it still uses -c 4 as native mode.
> >> I also noticed problems with logging to a pipe. The default
> >> rsyslog.conf file on Debian has a
> >> daemon.*;mail.*;\
> >> news.err;\
> >> *.=debug;*.=info;\
> >> *.=notice;*.=warn |/dev/xconsole
> >>
> >> But I get the following error:
> >>
> >> 9042.679173747:b7607b70: file to log to: |/dev/xconsole
> >> 9042.679183525:b7607b70: doWrite, pData->pStrm 0x814d8c0, lenBuf 131
> >> 9042.679194699:b7607b70: strm 0x814d8c0: file -1 flush, buflen 208
> >> 9042.679225429:b7607b70: strm 0x814d8c0: open error 2, file
> >> '|/dev/xconsole'
> >>
> >> I've put a complete debug log + config files at
> >> http://debs.michaelbiebl.de/rsyslog/v5
> >>
> >> Rainer, maybe you can take a look.
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >> Michael
> >>
> >> --
> >> Why is it that all of the instruments seeking intelligent life in
> the
> >> universe are pointed away from Earth?
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> rsyslog mailing list
> >> http://lists.adiscon.net/mailman/listinfo/rsyslog
> >> http://www.rsyslog.com
> >>
> > _______________________________________________
> > rsyslog mailing list
> > http://lists.adiscon.net/mailman/listinfo/rsyslog
> > http://www.rsyslog.com
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Why is it that all of the instruments seeking intelligent life in the
> universe are pointed away from Earth?
> _______________________________________________
> rsyslog mailing list
> http://lists.adiscon.net/mailman/listinfo/rsyslog
> http://www.rsyslog.com
More information about the rsyslog
mailing list