[rsyslog] rsyslog v5 5.2.0

[Rainer Gerhards]

Michael,

> I can confirm that a5cd509be736fcff3c8ae3104712d2fe85776416 fixes this
> issue for me using 5.2.0.
> What about the -c compat flag? Is it intentional that there is no -c 5?
> I will probably upload a 5.2.* to unstable (or experimental) soon,
> which should give it some wider exposure.

one more side-note: to do this, do you need a "stable" tag attached to the
version by the upstream? I am asking because it would be much more useful to
have wider exposure for 5.3.4, whereas 5.2.0 will probably not provide that
much useful feedback (the most interesting pieces inside the queue engine
already have been rewritten in 5.3).

Still, it is good to see that the stable tag now draws attention to the
version, I begin to think that nobody ever tried the beta ;) Maybe I should
attach stable tags earlier in the future.

Rainer