[rsyslog] Feedback request: ACLs, imudp and accepting messages
Rainer Gerhards
rgerhards at hq.adiscon.com
Tue Nov 17 08:15:22 CET 2009
> > Ideally, I think it would be a very interesting step to be able to
> > 'stack' syslog modules to define the path a given set of messages
> take
> > through the collector. Something akin to the Linux iptables concept,
> > where a basic high-speed framework is laid out with a well-defined
> > order and an API that enables administrators to elect how specific
> > run-time modules interact within the stack. That's less of a request
> > and more of a pipe dream, and is definitely influenced by the half
> > network security hat I wear.
>
> hmm, the recent ability to have secondary queues would allow this to
> fit
> in very nicely as a filter for what to do when moving messages between
> the
> queues.
I have thought more about this over the night. I think most of the
capabilities are already present, just need to be a bit "re-labled". However,
what is missing is functionality to use loadable modules as a filter
condition. However, especially for complex filters, this sounds very
valuable, both from a performance as well as from a capability POV. It also
looks like it is not hard to add.
I will definitely look into that direction. Thanks all for bringing up these
thoughts, any further comments are of course appreciated as well ;)
Rainer
More information about the rsyslog
mailing list