[Lognorm] Thought about %word%

[Champ Clark III [Softwink]]

On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 04:24:37PM +0100, Rainer Gerhards wrote:
> Word is actually a catch-all parser, and a thing to avoid as better parsers
> come it. I will soon make sure it will be tried as the last one. An email
> parsers seems to make a lot of sense. And probably a "alpha" parser, which
> takes a-zA-Z only. The bottom line is that the more precise, the better.

	Okay.. I just wanted to throw that out there.  Technically,  it
really hasn't been a issue for me. 

-- 
        Champ Clark III | Softwink, Inc | 800-538-9357 x 101
                     http://www.softwink.com

GPG Key ID: 58A2A58F
Key fingerprint = 7734 2A1C 007D 581E BDF7  6AD5 0F1F 655F 58A2 A58F
If it wasn't for C, we'd be using BASI, PASAL and OBOL.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.adiscon.net/pipermail/lognorm/attachments/20110120/fb577d16/attachment.pgp>