[Lognorm] Thought about %word%

[Rainer Gerhards]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: lognorm-bounces at lists.adiscon.com [mailto:lognorm-
> bounces at lists.adiscon.com] On Behalf Of Champ Clark III [Softwink]
> Sent: Thursday, January 20, 2011 4:30 PM
> To: lognorm
> Subject: Re: [Lognorm] Thought about %word%
> 
> On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 04:24:37PM +0100, Rainer Gerhards wrote:
> > Word is actually a catch-all parser, and a thing to avoid as better
> parsers
> > come it. I will soon make sure it will be tried as the last one. An
> email
> > parsers seems to make a lot of sense. And probably a "alpha" parser,
> which
> > takes a-zA-Z only. The bottom line is that the more precise, the
> better.
> 
> 	Okay.. I just wanted to throw that out there.  Technically,  it
> really hasn't been a issue for me.
> 

I guess it becomes an issue when the rulebases become larger. Parsers like
word increase the chance of rule interference -- greatly (IMHO, but
untested).

RAiner