From mbartos at redhat.com Tue Sep 18 13:58:01 2012 From: mbartos at redhat.com (Milan Bartos) Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2012 07:58:01 -0400 (EDT) Subject: [Lognorm] Normalizer utility rename In-Reply-To: <1909374804.302162.1347968916163.JavaMail.root@redhat.com> Message-ID: <875583845.303132.1347969481674.JavaMail.root@redhat.com> Hi all, we are currently getting liblognorm into Fedora [1], and almost have faced name conflict between normalize (for audio volume normalization) and normalizer (from liblognorm). We are trying to encourage upstream to avoid using such generic names. Could it be, please, possible to rename this binary in upstream (e.g. lognormalizer) or should we rename this inside Fedora packaging? Thanks in advance, Milan Bartos [1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=848388 From rgerhards at hq.adiscon.com Tue Sep 18 14:06:31 2012 From: rgerhards at hq.adiscon.com (Rainer Gerhards) Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2012 12:06:31 +0000 Subject: [Lognorm] Normalizer utility rename In-Reply-To: <875583845.303132.1347969481674.JavaMail.root@redhat.com> References: <1909374804.302162.1347968916163.JavaMail.root@redhat.com> <875583845.303132.1347969481674.JavaMail.root@redhat.com> Message-ID: <82D3B6EBB984E84DACE6028384F75FB9087B3CE0@vmexch2.intern.adiscon.com> > we are currently getting liblognorm into Fedora [1], and almost have That's good news! > faced name conflict between normalize (for audio volume normalization) > and normalizer (from liblognorm). > We are trying to encourage upstream to avoid using such generic names. > > Could it be, please, possible to rename this binary in upstream (e.g. > lognormalizer) or should we rename this inside Fedora packaging? I'll change it. I changed one program in the past, but that probably was in libee. I'll have a look soon and think lognormalizer sounds like a good suggestion (so if want to add a temporary Fedora patch, that's fine with me and I'll align to that name). If what I am currently doing goes well, I'll change later today. Rainer From rgerhards at hq.adiscon.com Tue Sep 18 14:56:50 2012 From: rgerhards at hq.adiscon.com (Rainer Gerhards) Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2012 12:56:50 +0000 Subject: [Lognorm] Normalizer utility rename In-Reply-To: <82D3B6EBB984E84DACE6028384F75FB9087B3CE0@vmexch2.intern.adiscon.com> References: <1909374804.302162.1347968916163.JavaMail.root@redhat.com> <875583845.303132.1347969481674.JavaMail.root@redhat.com> <82D3B6EBB984E84DACE6028384F75FB9087B3CE0@vmexch2.intern.adiscon.com> Message-ID: <82D3B6EBB984E84DACE6028384F75FB9087B3D3E@vmexch2.intern.adiscon.com> > > Could it be, please, possible to rename this binary in upstream (e.g. > > lognormalizer) or should we rename this inside Fedora packaging? > I'll change it. I changed one program in the past, but that probably > was in libee. I'll have a look soon and think lognormalizer sounds like > a good suggestion (so if want to add a temporary Fedora patch, that's > fine with me and I'll align to that name). > > If what I am currently doing goes well, I'll change later today. I just made the commit, a new release goes out soon. It's now named lognormalizer. Rainer From mbartos at redhat.com Tue Sep 18 14:59:16 2012 From: mbartos at redhat.com (Milan Bartos) Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2012 08:59:16 -0400 (EDT) Subject: [Lognorm] Normalizer utility rename In-Reply-To: <82D3B6EBB984E84DACE6028384F75FB9087B3D3E@vmexch2.intern.adiscon.com> Message-ID: <1422583352.317952.1347973156809.JavaMail.root@redhat.com> Thanks, Milan ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Rainer Gerhards" > To: "lognorm" > Sent: Tuesday, September 18, 2012 2:56:50 PM > Subject: Re: [Lognorm] Normalizer utility rename > > > > Could it be, please, possible to rename this binary in upstream > > > (e.g. > > > lognormalizer) or should we rename this inside Fedora packaging? > > I'll change it. I changed one program in the past, but that > > probably > > was in libee. I'll have a look soon and think lognormalizer sounds > > like > > a good suggestion (so if want to add a temporary Fedora patch, > > that's > > fine with me and I'll align to that name). > > > > If what I am currently doing goes well, I'll change later today. > I just made the commit, a new release goes out soon. It's now named > lognormalizer. > > Rainer > _______________________________________________ > Lognorm mailing list > Lognorm at lists.adiscon.com > http://lists.adiscon.net/mailman/listinfo/lognorm > From friedl at hq.adiscon.com Tue Sep 18 15:07:18 2012 From: friedl at hq.adiscon.com (Florian Riedl) Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2012 13:07:18 +0000 Subject: [Lognorm] liblognorm 0.3.5 released Message-ID: <37976BDE58194F47A8650875E556B9AB0878091C@vmexch2.intern.adiscon.com> We have just released liblognorm 0.3.5. Changes: Version 0.3.5 (rgerhards), 2012-09-18 renamed "normalizer" tool to "lognormalizer" to solve name clashes Thanks to the Fedora folks for pointing this out.: Download: http://www.liblognorm.com/download/liblognorm-0-3-5/ As always, feedback is appreciated. Best regards, Florian Riedl