[Lognorm] Patches for 'recursive' field type
singh.janmejay
singh.janmejay at gmail.com
Tue Dec 2 11:28:34 CET 2014
We also have a json-comparer as a part of this patch-set. This allows
lognorm tests to use equality tests of json-objects rather than having to
work with fragments of json in order to avoid key ordering problem.
On Tue, Dec 2, 2014 at 3:56 PM, singh.janmejay <singh.janmejay at gmail.com>
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Here are code-changes for 'recursive' field-type:
> https://github.com/janmejay/liblognorm/compare/janmejay:master...recursive?expand=1
>
> I wanted to put it out for review and discussion, hence this link.
>
> I'll create a pull request once already open pull request(for regex
> support) is wrapped up. Github tries to club old and new changes into one
> pull-request which mixes up multiple changes, so im trying to avoid that.
>
> --
> Regards,
> Janmejay
> http://codehunk.wordpress.com
>
--
Regards,
Janmejay
http://codehunk.wordpress.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.adiscon.net/pipermail/lognorm/attachments/20141202/a8a13203/attachment.html>
More information about the Lognorm
mailing list