[Lognorm] PR for field-type 'float' and field-types for parsing suffixed-values('suffixed' and 'named_suffixed')

[Rainer Gerhards]

2015-02-27 14:57 GMT+01:00 singh.janmejay <singh.janmejay at gmail.com>:

> Sounds good.
>
> Also, noticed we don't enable test-bench and valgrind on travis. It'll
> be very useful to have them enabled for travis. Also, we should
> probably enable regex too on travis(infact all optional things should
> be enabled to exercise as many tests as possible).
>
> Shall I do this in current PR?
>
>
yes, please do!

Side-note: do you have some logs to share for the tests and research I am
currently working on?

Rainer

> On Fri, Feb 27, 2015 at 6:55 PM, Rainer Gerhards
> <rgerhards at hq.adiscon.com> wrote:
> > 2015-02-27 14:05 GMT+01:00 singh.janmejay <singh.janmejay at gmail.com>:
> >>
> >> - Implemented float (a type that parses real numbers in form of
> >> nnn.nnn) (note that this doesn't handle n.nnne^nn or any other
> >> scientific notation, but then those are not all that common in logs)
> >>
> >> - Implemented suffixed and named_suffixed field types that allow
> >> parsing of fields that have one of many potential suffixes (like a
> >> disk-space value which may have suffix kb, mb, gb etc). Field
> >> named_suffixed does exactly the same thing as suffixed, but allows
> >> user to name the parsed-value and suffix field unlike suffixed, which
> >> provides default names "value" and "suffix".
> >>
> >> - Tokenized wasn't working with lognorm special characters ('%' and
> >> ':') because it wasn't unescaping token-string, which is now fixed.
> >>
> >>
> >
> > This sounds really good. Given the fact that I was about to release the
> > current version, I think it would make sense to postpone  that for a few
> > days to permit releasing the new things in that same release.
> >
> > Any concerns?
> > Rainer
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> Regards,
> >> Janmejay
> >> http://codehunk.wordpress.com
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Lognorm mailing list
> >> Lognorm at lists.adiscon.com
> >> http://lists.adiscon.net/mailman/listinfo/lognorm
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Lognorm mailing list
> > Lognorm at lists.adiscon.com
> > http://lists.adiscon.net/mailman/listinfo/lognorm
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Regards,
> Janmejay
> http://codehunk.wordpress.com
> _______________________________________________
> Lognorm mailing list
> Lognorm at lists.adiscon.com
> http://lists.adiscon.net/mailman/listinfo/lognorm
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.adiscon.net/pipermail/lognorm/attachments/20150227/774a4f6a/attachment-0001.html>